Apple Card Shift from Goldman to JPMorgan Puts Small Tech Firm CoreCard on the Chopping Block

By
Anup S
5 min read

Apple Card’s Hidden Casualty: The Small Tech Firm Left Behind by Wall Street’s Exit

NEW YORK — In the heart of Manhattan’s financial district, where Goldman Sachs once aimed to reinvent consumer banking, a quieter crisis is unfolding nearly a thousand miles away—in Norcross, Georgia. There, a small fintech company named CoreCard is facing a moment of reckoning that highlights the often-unseen consequences of high-profile financial partnerships.

Goldman Sachs’ decision to exit its $20 billion Apple Card venture—now reportedly in JPMorgan Chase’s sights—signals more than just a shift in strategy. It reveals the fragile position of smaller tech firms that power headline-grabbing products but are left exposed when market conditions turn or larger partners pivot.

CoreCard’s story captures the harsh truth at the intersection of Big Tech and Wall Street: even groundbreaking innovation can’t shield smaller players from the risks of dependency.

Apple Card (gstatic.com)
Apple Card (gstatic.com)


A Powerful Partnership, Now in Question

CoreCard’s fortunes rose dramatically in 2019 when Goldman Sachs launched the Apple Card. The Georgia-based firm provided the processing technology behind the card’s standout features—like its visual payment wheel, calendar-based billing, and clear, consumer-friendly fee structures.

“CoreCard essentially became the invisible engine powering Apple’s consumer credit experience,” said one fintech analyst, who spoke anonymously due to client obligations. “Without their tech, Goldman’s partnership with Apple wouldn’t have worked.”

That partnership became a financial lifeline for CoreCard. Analysts estimate that up to 70% of the company’s revenue was tied to its work on the Apple Card through Goldman Sachs. For a once-obscure company, the association brought credibility—but also a dangerous reliance on a single client.

CoreCard CEO Leland Strange recently described the company’s situation as “unique and odd,” expressing doubts about whether the relationship would survive under a new banking partner.


Why Goldman Pulled Back

Goldman’s retreat from the Apple Card reflects a broader shift within traditional banking. What began as a bold collaboration between Wall Street and Silicon Valley ran into structural challenges that proved difficult to overcome.

One key issue was the card’s user base: about 34% of balances were held by borrowers with credit scores below 660—subprime by industry standards, and more than double JPMorgan’s usual exposure. That risk, combined with Apple’s consumer-first demands (like removing late fees), squeezed the card’s profitability.

The problems didn’t end there. In October 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau hit Apple and Goldman with over $89 million in penalties for customer dispute mishandling and misleading communications. The public fallout not only damaged the partnership’s image but also made a clean handoff to another bank more complicated.

“There’s regulatory baggage that hangs over any potential transition,” said a former banking executive familiar with credit card acquisitions. “No successor wants to inherit unresolved compliance problems.”


JPMorgan Steps In—Cautiously

Now, JPMorgan Chase appears poised to take over the Apple Card portfolio. With its vast resources and infrastructure, the bank is well-positioned to handle the deal—but not without conditions.

Sources say negotiations are focusing on changes to the card’s structure to reduce risk. JPMorgan may push to replace some of the card’s unique features—like calendar-based billing and dynamic payment displays—with more standard processes that align with its risk systems.

That shift could have a ripple effect. If JPMorgan overhauls the card’s servicing model, the specialized technology CoreCard built may no longer be needed. JPMorgan’s robust internal processing capabilities would likely take over, sidelining smaller external vendors.


A Quiet Exit: CoreCard’s Sale

Facing that possibility, CoreCard took preemptive action. Payments firm Euronet Worldwide recently announced it would acquire CoreCard in an all-stock deal valued at around $248 million.

For CoreCard, the sale offers both relief and resignation. It’s a sharp fall from the company’s earlier peak valuation—once estimated at nearly $490 million during the Apple Card’s initial boom.

For Euronet, the acquisition is a chance to buy into proven technology with a high-profile track record. The goal? To repackage CoreCard’s "Apple Card pedigree" for markets abroad, where Apple’s brand carries even more weight.

“Euronet is essentially buying the tech and the narrative,” explained one payments executive. “The question is whether they can turn that into growth somewhere else.”


What It Means for Investors

This transition presents several angles for savvy investors.

The Apple Card’s high subprime exposure could create opportunities in credit derivatives, especially if JPMorgan negotiates risk-sharing terms or isolates higher-risk segments of the portfolio.

Equity investors may view Euronet’s CoreCard acquisition as a value play. The purchase price reflects CoreCard’s weakened position, but there’s potential upside if Euronet can expand into more profitable international markets. Execution, however, will be everything.

The broader takeaway for fintech players? Client concentration is a risk not just in revenue, but in survival. Future deals may include clauses to reduce overreliance on single clients—diversification targets, break-up fees, or built-in valuation adjustments tied to partner strategy changes.


Regulatory Watchdogs and Competitive Jockeying

Any transfer of the Apple Card portfolio will likely attract further regulatory attention. The unresolved issues from the Goldman partnership could force JPMorgan—or any alternative buyer—to make operational changes or commit to additional customer protections.

Meanwhile, other issuers like American Express, Barclays, and Synchrony are watching from the sidelines. If JPMorgan’s talks falter, these players could step in with creative proposals—perhaps dividing the portfolio by risk profile or experimenting with dual-issuance models that still involve specialized tech providers.


Looking Ahead: Lessons and Legacy

The Apple Card’s next chapter isn’t just about who takes over—it’s about how the financial industry evolves. Early partnerships between tech and finance often favored innovation over profitability. That trade-off is becoming harder to justify.

Going forward, expect tighter agreements, clearer risk-sharing, and broader vendor networks. The era of building billion-dollar platforms on single-point tech dependencies—like CoreCard’s role in the Apple Card—is likely ending.

For investors and executives, this shift offers a window into the real cost of innovation, and the importance of durability in partnerships. CoreCard’s journey ends in acquisition, but its story offers a cautionary tale for the next wave of fintech builders.

As JPMorgan finalizes its strategy, Euronet begins integration, and Apple rethinks its financial services approach, the true impact of this transition will unfold in the quarters ahead.

Keep an eye on upcoming earnings calls from JPMorgan and Euronet for integration updates. Regulatory filings may also shed light on the terms governing the portfolio’s transfer and the strategies used to manage associated risks.

You May Also Like

This article is submitted by our user under the News Submission Rules and Guidelines. The cover photo is computer generated art for illustrative purposes only; not indicative of factual content. If you believe this article infringes upon copyright rights, please do not hesitate to report it by sending an email to us. Your vigilance and cooperation are invaluable in helping us maintain a respectful and legally compliant community.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get the latest in enterprise business and tech with exclusive peeks at our new offerings

We use cookies on our website to enable certain functions, to provide more relevant information to you and to optimize your experience on our website. Further information can be found in our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Service . Mandatory information can be found in the legal notice