Mexican Business Leader Fernando Chico Pardo Buys 25% of Banamex Bank from Citi for $2.3 Billion

By
A Leitão
6 min read

Wall Street Steps Back: Citi’s $2.3 Billion Banamex Deal

A Mexican Tycoon Buys a Piece of History

Citigroup is pulling back from Mexican retail banking, and it just made a deal that shows exactly how Wall Street is rethinking its global footprint. On Wednesday, the bank announced that Mexican businessman Fernando Chico Pardo will buy a 25% stake in Banco Nacional de México, better known as Banamex, for about $2.3 billion.

This isn’t just another financial transaction. It’s the closing of a chapter that began more than twenty years ago, when Citi first took control of Mexico’s fourth-largest bank. It’s also a blueprint for how big American banks can carefully unwind their investments in emerging markets without sparking political pushback.

Banamex (licdn.com)
Banamex (licdn.com)

Why Chico Pardo?

Citi didn’t choose Chico Pardo by accident. He’s stepping in as the local face of Banamex’s future. His firm will purchase about 520 million shares, priced at 0.80 times book value, or around 42 billion pesos. If regulators give the green light, the deal should wrap up in the second half of 2026.

What makes him the right fit? Chico Pardo knows both worlds. He’s the founder of Promecap, a private equity group with $5 billion under management, but he’s also deeply connected to Mexico’s business scene. His investments in airport operator ASUR and port operator Carrix give him a track record of managing assets critical to Mexico’s economy.

Unlike some of the country’s old-guard tycoons, Chico Pardo doesn’t carry heavy political baggage. That makes him far more palatable to regulators and less likely to trigger a wave of nationalist criticism that often greets foreign-linked deals.

Citi’s Global Retreat

This isn’t a one-off decision. Citi has been steadily shrinking its consumer banking footprint abroad, selling operations in Asia to firms like DBS and UOB. CEO Jane Fraser has made it clear: the future isn’t in sprawling retail networks, but in slimmer, more profitable business lines.

Why? The math no longer works. Stricter capital rules, the rise of fintech challengers, and pressure from local governments have made it harder for global banks to make money in everyday retail banking. The trend now is simplification—fewer branches, fewer risks, and more focus on corporate clients.

The Banamex sale shows how tough those realities are. Citi is taking a $726 million impairment charge, a stark admission that its $12.5 billion purchase of Banamex back in 2001 didn’t live up to the hype. The discounted valuation isn’t just about market shifts—it’s also the price of keeping regulators and politicians on board.

Betting on Nearshoring

Even as Citi sheds consumer banking, it’s doubling down on services that support cross-border business. Think of treasury management, trade finance, foreign exchange, and capital markets. Those businesses don’t need physical branches, but they do fuel the growing U.S.-Mexico trade relationship.

Nearshoring—companies moving factories closer to American consumers—has sparked a surge in investment in Mexico. And Citi is positioning itself to ride that wave. For the bank, this shift could be more lucrative than trying to compete in Mexico’s crowded retail space.

Analysts argue that by focusing on these institutional services, Citi could generate higher returns with less regulatory headache.

A Model for Future Exits

The structure of this deal—anchoring Banamex with a trusted local investor now, followed by a public offering later—might become a playbook for banks leaving sensitive markets. It balances the needs of regulators, foreign owners, and local partners.

We’ve already seen similar moves elsewhere. HSBC pulled out of Canada and Argentina. Barclays has trimmed its European consumer business. Société Générale scaled back in Africa. But Banamex stands out, both in scale and in symbolism.

For regulators, the plan ensures local control without destabilizing a key part of Mexico’s financial system. For Citi, it shows progress in simplifying its global structure. And for Chico Pardo, it’s an opportunity to step into a commanding role at a discount price.

The Digital Challenge Ahead

Still, Banamex’s new era won’t be smooth sailing. Mexico’s financial sector is changing quickly, and digital players like Nu and MercadoPago have already eaten into market share. Their app-first approach appeals to younger consumers in a way traditional banks struggle to match. Unless Banamex proves it can modernize and compete, its planned IPO could fall flat.

There’s also the question of politics. Mexico’s leadership will shift beyond President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, and future administrations could change the tone on foreign ownership or banking regulation. Global equity markets add another layer of uncertainty, which could delay the IPO or reshape its terms.

A Turning Point

At its core, this deal marks the end of an era. Banks like Citi are no longer chasing global retail dominance. Instead, they’re focusing on where they can add value without drowning in complexity.

Banamex now faces the challenge of proving it can thrive under local stewardship, while Citi bets on becoming a critical financial partner for companies building the next generation of U.S.-Mexico trade.

Whether this $2.3 billion bet pays off will ripple far beyond Mexico. The outcome could shape how global banks rethink their strategies in other emerging markets for years to come.

House Investment Thesis

AspectSummary
Core ThesisCiti-Banamex is part of a broader de-globalization & simplification trend. Global banks are exiting non-core, politically sensitive EM retail franchises to recycle capital into higher-ROE, lower-friction businesses (transaction services, cards, wealth). The "anchor-then-IPO" playbook is a novel solution to manage political/regulatory risks.
Exception or Trend?Trend. Confirmed by multiple bank actions: Citi (Asia consumer sales), HSBC (exits in Canada, Argentina, France), Barclays (exits in Germany), Société Générale (pruning Africa), ING (exits France). The exception is the specific two-step exit structure due to Banamex's brand and Mexico's politics.
Root Causes1. Capital & Complexity Pressure: Basel rules push G-SIBs to free RWA from low-return retail.
2. Politics & Localization Risk: EM retail is politically sensitive; local anchors de-risk approvals.
3. Digital Disruption: Fintechs (e.g., Nu, Klar) compress retail economics, raising tech capex hurdles.
4. Macro/Regionalization: Nearshoring benefits institutional businesses (e.g., payments, trade finance), which banks are keeping.
Key Players & Moves (Comparables)- Citi: Selling Banamex (25% to anchor, then IPO); previously exited Asia consumer units.
- HSBC: Sold Canada to RBC, exiting Argentina, sold French retail. Playbook: Simplify, pivot to Asia.
- Barclays: Sold German consumer bank to BAWAG. Playbook: Simplify non-core Europe, free RWA.
- Société Générale: Disposals in Africa. Playbook: Reduce subscale EM exposure, focus on core Europe & CIB.
- ING: Exited French retail. Playbook: Withdraw from lagging markets.
Distinctive Features of Citi-Banamex- Anchor at a Discount: ~0.8x book value to a local buyer (Fernando Chico Pardo) for regulatory/political certainty.
- Keeps Institutional Business: Citi retains higher-ROE institutional operations in Mexico to monetize nearshoring.
- De-risked Path to IPO: Local anchor helps "re-Mexicanize" the brand, smoothing the way for a future listing.
Positioning Implications (Thematic)- Longs: Local consolidators (e.g., BAWAG, Galicia) buying assets below book; Global banks focusing on institutional (Citi, JPM).
- Pairs/Relative Value: Fade IPO exuberance for EM retail vs. anchor's discount price.
- Watchlist: More exits from European banks in Africa/LatAm using minority stake + listing structures.
Risks to the Thesis- Basel Rule Changes: Softer/final rules could slow/accelerate RWA disposal urgency.
- EM IPO Window: Volatility could delay listings like Banamex's.
- Fintech Competition: Continued share capture by digital players pressures legacy retail multiples.
- Nearshoring Hype: If FDI underwhelms, institutional banking growth could be slower.
Concrete Predictions1. More "anchor-then-IPO" deals in EM retail.
2. EM retail franchises will clear below book value (Banamex's 0.8x sets a reference).
3. Institutional > Retail profitability in Mexico for global banks.
4. European banks will continue pruning subscale geographies for RWA release and buybacks.
Bottom LineNot an outlier. Represents a durable industry shift: shrink the perimeter, localize ownership where politics matter, keep the cross-border institutional engine. The "anchor-then-IPO" sequence is a key innovation for managing frictions, expecting more such deals.

NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE

You May Also Like

This article is submitted by our user under the News Submission Rules and Guidelines. The cover photo is computer generated art for illustrative purposes only; not indicative of factual content. If you believe this article infringes upon copyright rights, please do not hesitate to report it by sending an email to us. Your vigilance and cooperation are invaluable in helping us maintain a respectful and legally compliant community.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get the latest in enterprise business and tech with exclusive peeks at our new offerings

We use cookies on our website to enable certain functions, to provide more relevant information to you and to optimize your experience on our website. Further information can be found in our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Service . Mandatory information can be found in the legal notice