MiniMax Stock Surges Past Baidu in Market Cap — What China's AI Valuation Shock Means for Investors

By
Xiaoling Qian
1 min read

On March 10, 2026, MiniMax — an AI startup incorporated fewer than five years ago — closed the Hong Kong trading session with a market capitalization of HK$382.6 billion, surpassing Baidu's HK$332.2 billion by roughly HK$50 billion. The single-day gap followed a two-day surge of more than 51%, capping a 488% run since MiniMax's January 9 IPO, when it debuted at HK$345 per share and its market cap stood near HK$137 billion. It had already overtaken Ctrip and Kuaishou on the way up. Now it had claimed Baidu — the company that for a decade held the unofficial title of China's AI standard-bearer. The founder of MiniMax once interned there and won its scholarship. The symbolism was hard to miss.

Numbers That Make the Crossing Harder to Explain — and Easier to Understand

The financial chasm between the two companies is almost comically wide. Baidu posted 2025 revenues of RMB 129.1 billion; MiniMax posted $79 million (roughly RMB 574 million) — a gap of 239 times. Baidu earned a net profit of RMB 5.6 billion. MiniMax lost an adjusted $250.9 million, and on an IFRS basis lost $1.87 billion, largely from fair-value swings on financial liabilities. MiniMax burns approximately $10 for every $1 of revenue it generates.

Yet MiniMax's revenue grew 159% year-on-year, while Baidu's fell 3%. And MiniMax's price-to-sales ratio — calculated against its 2025 audited revenue — has exceeded 618 times. For context, OpenAI's most recent private valuation of roughly $850 billion against approximately $25 billion in annualized revenue implies a multiple of around 34 times. MiniMax is being priced at nearly 18 times the multiple of the most famous AI company on earth.

The direct catalyst was OpenClaw, a widely adopted AI agent platform that lists MiniMax as an official large-model provider. MiniMax launched MaxClaw, its own managed cloud assistant built atop OpenClaw, on February 26. Days later, Tencent announced its rival agent product "QClaw," which markets read as validation that AI agent commercialization across China was accelerating — lifting the entire AI-native cohort. MiniMax also released Voice Maker and Music Maker capabilities. Morgan Stanley noted that MiniMax's annualized recurring revenue jumped from $100 million to $150 million in just two months, token consumption of its M2 model rose sixfold between December 2025 and February 2026, and per-token inference cost fell more than 50%. The bank maintained an Overweight rating with a HK$990 target price.

The Regime Signal Buried Inside the Multiple

The crossing is not a verdict on current business quality. It is a market declaration about where the next control layer of technology will reside — and who owns it.

Baidu's AI revenues are not negligible: AI applications generated over RMB 10 billion in 2025, and AI cloud contributed roughly RMB 20 billion. In Q4, AI-powered business represented 43% of Baidu General Business revenue. The problem is structural, not absent. Its legacy search and advertising businesses are deteriorating faster than AI can compensate, compressing the consolidated narrative even as the AI line grows. Baidu responded the way mature capital allocators do: a $5 billion buyback authorization and a new dividend policy. That is not a growth signal. It is a maturity signal.

MiniMax, by contrast, derives over 70% of its 2025 revenues from international markets and spans consumer and enterprise use cases. Morgan Stanley frames the total addressable opportunity at $41 billion in global enterprise AI, with MiniMax potentially capturing 3% of that market. The company carries HKEX's "pre-commercial specialist technology" classification — the exchange's formal acknowledgment that commercial maturity is not yet proven.

This is the sharpest framing for investors: the market is not saying MiniMax has won. It is saying the old businesses may be structurally de-rated while the new firms may own the next choke point. That is a duration and multiple story first, a fundamentals story second. At 618 times sales, MiniMax is not being priced as China's next AI winner. It is being priced as one of a handful of global platform winners — a far higher and more fragile bar. The milestone is real. The extrapolation is dangerous.

not investment advice

You May Also Like

This article is submitted by our user under the News Submission Rules and Guidelines. The cover photo is computer generated art for illustrative purposes only; not indicative of factual content. If you believe this article infringes upon copyright rights, please do not hesitate to report it by sending an email to us. Your vigilance and cooperation are invaluable in helping us maintain a respectful and legally compliant community.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get the latest in enterprise business and tech with exclusive peeks at our new offerings

We use cookies on our website to enable certain functions, to provide more relevant information to you and to optimize your experience on our website. Further information can be found in our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Service . Mandatory information can be found in the legal notice