The End of Cheap Music: How AI is Shaking Up a $30 Billion Industry
The music world has hit its own ChatGPT moment. After ten steady years of rebuilding—global revenues climbed to nearly $30 billion in 2024, with streaming making up 70%—the industry now faces a tidal wave of change. Artificial intelligence can crank out studio-quality songs almost instantly, and at virtually no cost. The real question isn’t if AI will reshape music creation, but whether the old guard can stop the flood or be swept away by it.
AI tools like Suno v5 and Udio are leading this revolution. They don’t just remix samples or stitch together loops; they generate full tracks—vocals, instruments, mix, everything—from a simple text prompt. Earlier systems felt more like toys. These new ones? They’re professional-grade demo machines. Imagine typing “upbeat indie pop with dreamy vocals,” hitting enter, and having a finished song ready before your coffee cools.
The reaction from the music giants says it all. Instead of fighting with endless lawsuits, Universal Music Group (UMG) cut a deal with Udio in late 2025. The two plan to launch a licensed AI music platform next year, where every bit of training data is cleared and every artist gets paid. It’s a bold pivot—a clear message that UMG would rather build a walled garden than face a lawless digital jungle.
The Economics of Too Much Music
Here’s where things get messy. Spotify deleted a jaw-dropping 75 million songs in 2024—more than it hosted the year before. It also set new minimum-stream rules so spam tracks wouldn’t drain royalty pools. And all that happened before AI-generated music got this good. Now, with anyone able to produce endless “radio-ready” songs in minutes, supply is going through the roof while demand stays flat.
There’s only so much time in a day to listen to music. Subscription growth is slowing, and attention isn’t infinite. When there’s an ocean of songs but the same number of ears, the value shifts. The scarce resource isn’t the song anymore—it’s distribution and rights management. Whoever controls what gets played and how it’s cleared wins.
The First to Fall
AI won’t wipe out every musician overnight, but it’s already squeezing the bottom of the ladder. Entry-level session players, stock vocalists, and ghostwriters for hire are feeling the pressure. One indie game studio recently showed what’s coming: two developers, no musical background, used AI to compose and master a full soundtrack over a weekend—music that would’ve cost thousands and taken weeks just a few years ago.
Production music libraries are especially vulnerable. Those $50 stock tracks for ads and YouTube videos? They’re becoming obsolete. Why buy generic music when you can type “corporate techno vibe, 30 seconds long” and get it instantly—for pennies?
Even orchestral recordings are getting undercut. Producers once paid around $275 per track to record string sections; now they’re using AI tools to “re-render” performances for as little as $14. The results aren’t perfect yet, but each software update closes the gap.
Vocalists are next. The latest AI voices from Suno v5 already fool casual listeners. For demos, social videos, or low-budget releases, AI singers are cheaper, faster, and good enough for most. Only artists with truly unique tones or magnetic stage presence will hold their ground.
Where the Money Goes Now
So who profits when making music costs nothing? Follow the money and you’ll find three key players emerging.
First, compliance tech—companies that can spot AI-generated audio, trace its origins, and confirm who owns what. As streaming services tighten disclosure rules, these firms will become the new gatekeepers.
Second, licensed creation platforms. Universal’s deal with Udio shows the new model: if you want to train your AI on real music, you’ll need to pay for the privilege. That gives labels like Universal, Sony, and Warner enormous leverage as the only sources of clean, licensed data.
Third, tools that manage derivative works. UMG’s system will let users remix or expand existing songs—but tracking who gets paid for each variation is a technical nightmare. Whoever solves that problem will own the infrastructure behind the next phase of music creation.
As for unlicensed AI platforms hoping to flood Spotify with “AI songs”? That ship has sailed. The major players have made it clear—they’ll delete and demonetize rather than dilute their royalty pools.
Why Humans Still Matter
Ironically, the more digital music floods the market, the more valuable real human performance becomes. When everything sounds perfect and abundant, imperfection—the crack in a live voice, the energy of a crowd—feels priceless. That’s why record labels are shifting budgets toward live shows and artist branding. Not because discovery got easier, but because standing out got harder.
The new music landscape will likely be top-heavy. Major labels will tighten their grip, cashing in on both sides—training data and distribution rights. Superstar artists with charisma and live appeal will thrive. Everyone else—those making solid but replaceable music—will face brutal automation.
The AI revolution in music isn’t on the horizon; it’s already humming through your headphones. The next few years won’t just determine who makes the music, but who controls the stage where it’s heard.
NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE